Kenneth Okonkwo Criticizes Labour Party Leadership, Calls for Major Overhaul

Kenneth Okonkwo Criticizes Labour Party Leadership, Calls for Major Overhaul Jun, 21 2024

Kenneth Okonkwo's Critique of the Labour Party Leadership

Kenneth Okonkwo, a well-known chieftain of the Labour Party, has unleashed a wave of criticism against the party’s current leadership. Speaking publicly, Okonkwo lambasted the Abure-led executive, going so far as to liken it to a 'secret society' that operates with a disturbing lack of transparency and integrity. He minced no words, calling them 'workers of iniquity' and expressing deep dissatisfaction with the direction in which the party is heading.

Okonkwo's criticism is rooted in several concerns. Foremost among them is the perceived lack of honesty and credibility within the party’s leadership. He openly questioned their ability to hold a fair and transparent national convention, which he sees as fundamental to the Labour Party's democratic values. According to Okonkwo, the current executives are failing to uphold these values, and this failure could have dire consequences for the party's future. He pointed out that if the Labour Party continues on its present trajectory without significant reforms, he would have no choice but to sever his ties with it.

Why the Labour Party Leadership is Being Compared to a “Secret Society”

Okonkwo didn't hold back when discussing his reasons for comparing the Labour Party's leadership to a secret society. He described an atmosphere of secrecy and exclusion that has concerned many within the party. According to him, the leaders, particularly under Abure’s guidance, operate in a manner that is closed-off and inaccessible to the rank and file members. This kind of operation, in his view, is deeply undemocratic and stands in stark contrast to the inclusive principles upon which the Labour Party was founded.

Such comparisons are not made lightly, especially in a political landscape where transparency and democratic processes are paramount. Okonkwo warned that if these practices persist, it will do more than just alienate members—it will undermine the very foundation of the Labour Party. The use of strong language, such as 'workers of iniquity,' underscores the depth of his frustration and the urgent need for change he sees within the party’s ranks.

Integrity and Credibility at Stake

Integrity and credibility are recurring themes in Okonkwo’s critique. He accused the current leadership of lacking both, a claim that raises serious concerns about the public perception of the party. For political entities, credibility is everything. It’s what garners public trust and support, and without it, a party risks sinking into irrelevance. Okonkwo's insistence on these values highlights his desire for a return to principled leadership that can inspire confidence among supporters and potential voters alike.

He also highlighted the necessity for a credible national convention. Such a convention is seen as a cornerstone of democratic practice within the party. Okonkwo questioned the willingness and ability of the current leadership to organize an event that would be transparent, fair, and inclusive to all party members. A flawed national convention, he argued, would only deepen the mistrust and dissatisfaction already brewing within the party.

Calls for Leadership Overhaul

The climax of Okonkwo’s barrage of criticisms came with his call for Aburi and his colleagues to step down. Okonkwo did not mince words, suggesting that their resignation would be a crucial first step towards salvaging the party. Characterizing them as 'workers of iniquity' who should be 'apprehended,' he demanded a clean slate. This dramatic call to action underscores the urgency and gravity of the issues at hand. According to him, without such a drastic measure, the party risks losing its way entirely.

In suggesting such action, Okonkwo is not merely attacking the current leadership; he is advocating for a complete overhaul. He believes that replacing the current leaders with individuals who hold democratic values and integrity dear could put the party back on the right track. Such changes, he argues, are not only necessary but urgent if the Labour Party hopes to remain viable and relevant in the political arena.

The Future of the Labour Party

Okonkwo’s warnings and criticisms leave no doubt about his passion for the Labour Party and his fears for its future. By highlighting the flaws within the current leadership, he aims to rally other concerned members to push for change. His critique serves as a wake-up call, urging the party to return to its core principles and address the issues harming its integrity and democratic values.

As the Labour Party navigates these turbulent times, the calls for reform and transparency will likely echo louder. The future direction of the party may greatly depend on how its leaders respond to such outspoken calls for change. It remains to be seen whether these criticisms will lead to meaningful reform or whether the party will continue down its criticized path.


In essence, Kenneth Okonkwo has thrown down the gauntlet, challenging the Labour Party’s current leadership to rise to the occasion and restore the party’s integrity. His criticisms are not just complaints but a clarion call for action. If the Labour Party is to thrive and stay true to its democratic ideals, significant changes are imperative. Okonkwo's words may just be the impetus needed for such a transformation.